He was a skater boy. He wiped out. He sued the City. The City moved for summary judgment.
Hockey is synonymous with life in Canada, making it no surprise that it has been the subject of litigation in the past.
A recent lawsuit out of New York state against the Canadian company PornHub provides a tongue in cheek reminder to employers that the provision of services in Ontario must not discriminate based on disability.
See how this accident benefits insurer successfully defended a plaintiff’s motion to compel it to produce information about its claim reserves.
ONSC: In a threshold motion, the evidence of family members should never be ignored; a clean pre-accident health matters; the ability to work may be irrelevant on a threshold motion; and a court will want to help a likeable and credible plaintiff.
The Superior Court’s decision in Grossman v. Nissan is yet another example of a data breach involving the theft of personal information resulting in a class action.
The Court of Appeal has held that the trial judge should have taken into account changes in market interest rates when exercising his discretion to award prejudgment interest of 5%.Judgment varied to prejudgment interest at 1.3%.
Do plaintiffs have to sue in federal court for PIPEDA violations? Maybe not anymore!
The Court of Appeal has overturned a summary judgment decision in a coverage case, finding the judge reversed the burden of proof and failed to recognize that a trial is required in cases of potential fraud, where credibility is in issue.
As an accident benefits adjuster, what do you need to do to when a claimant approaches you about a new claim? What do you need to send them? When is an application “complete”? What is deflection? Can you say “go away”?