An American court found that allegations of improper collection and use of biometric data may attract coverage under insurance policies that don’t explicitly provide such coverage. Policy wording is incredibly important to limit risk and exposure – what do your policies say?
The Ontario Court of Appeal finds data exclusions to be “clear and unambiguous”.
The tort of “harassment in internet communications” has arrived in Ontario!
What happens when a court finds an employee has no chance of success in privacy claim against their employer?
After a practicum student accessed personal health records of an ex-partner and his new girlfriend on numerous occasions, the Alberta Court ordered a fine of $6,000.00, along with community service.
A man tells the privacy commissioner that his former spouse sent and downloaded private and confidential work documents to his email and personal home computer.