Dec 3, 2021 | Accident Benefits, Tort
Are brain SPECT scans admissible in personal injury proceedings?
Sep 1, 2021 | Accident Benefits
In a recent LAT decision, the adjudicator was unfavorably “shocked” at an insurer’s conduct toward its insured. Let’s talk about what went so terribly wrong in this motion to dismiss an application.
May 4, 2020 | Accident Benefits, Emerging Issues
One, Both, or None: How do SABS claims handle the new Canada Emergency Relief Benefit and IRBs?
Jan 23, 2020 | Accident Benefits
See how this accident benefits insurer successfully defended a plaintiff’s motion to compel it to produce information about its claim reserves.
Mar 22, 2019 | Accident Benefits
In a very surprising turn of events, the long awaited judicial review of MVAC v. Barnes, P16-00087 FSCO was dismissed as moot when it was revealed that the outcome of the judicial review would have no effect on either of the parties appearing before the Divisional...
Mar 13, 2019 | Accident Benefits
A recent decision of the Divisional Court has confirmed that the ‘but for’ test was the correct causation test to be applied in accident benefit cases. In Sabadash v. State Farm et al, prior to the subject accident in March 2011, Mr. Sabadash had a pre-accident...